I guess that we have to rely on REAL PC developers like 4A games and DICE to pick up the baton and push the boundaries of visual realism now. What happened to Crytek's design team? They abandoned the formula that made them great in the past and made a **** COD clone. Hell, Cry Engine 1 might have looked better.
If they had rendered this game with the Cry Engine 2, it would have looked much better. Why did they bother making Cry Engine 3? Screw the damn consoles. In this regard the game disappoints on all fronts: the lighting is excessive and fake, the motion blur is nauseating and overdone, bad textures are everywhere, the vegetation is lacking in geometric detail, object deformation effects are virtually absent, and the skin shading is sub-par. Why isn't it here now? Don't even get me started on the graphics: they are horrid, especially considering how good the first Crysis looked.
This destructibility was present in the first game. Lampposts stay standing after enduring a round of swarmer missiles buildings don't deform after taking a shot from a tank. Moreover, the environment is now completely static. You can either use armor and go in with your guns blazing, or you can use stealth to sneak by everyone, possibly killing him or her silently along the way. That incredible ability to approach the situation from any conceivable angle is now gone you only have two options in this game. WTF? The game also loses the vaunted sandbox nature of its predecessor. The aliens aren't even the same ones that were featured in the first game. It is also riddled with plot holes and continuity issues. The first game didn't have a stellar story, but this story is even worse. It is, in fact, far inferior to Crysis in almost every way. The aliens aren't even the same ones that were featured in the This should not be called Crysis 2: this game is nothing like its predecessor. This should not be called Crysis 2: this game is nothing like its predecessor.
0 kommentar(er)
